Christmas Experience Academy (5cr)
Code: TCIM0303-3002
General information
- Enrollment
- 13.08.2024 - 28.08.2024
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 26.08.2024 - 01.11.2024
- Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Faculty of Social Sciences
- Teaching languages
- English
- Seats
- 5 - 30
- Teachers
- Adrian Sawicki
- Minni Haanpää
- Tiamat Warda
- Teacher in charge
- Tiamat Warda
- Groups
-
YTKENGSOC/YTK - Courses offered in English
- Course
- TCIM0303
Evaluation scale
H-5
Objective
After completion of the course the student is able to
- recognize central theoretical discussions on tourism experience
- analyze the production and consumption of tourism experiences
- critically evaluate how the theories and models related to the experience economy can be used to develop commercial tourism experiences
- recognize the organizational characteristics of Christmas as an economic and socio-cultural phenomenon.
Execution methods
Online and on-site teaching: lectures (20 h), workshops (20 h) with commissioners, independent work (85 h).
Accomplishment methods
Active participation in lectures, workshops and the one-week intensive programme.
e-portfolio, group work report and presentations.
Content
Tourism experience, Meaningful experiences, Destination experiences, Value co-creation, Experience economy, Christmas as an organizational phenomenon, Storytelling, Embodiment in tourism experiences.
Materials
Reading package including peer-reviewed articles will become available at the beginning of the course.
Teaching methods
This course includes mandatory attendance on-site of all sessions during the intensive week 23.9.-27.9.2024
This course also includes an online period before and after the intensive week.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Fail: Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work may be based on serious misunderstandings.
Sufficient and satisfactory (1-2): Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The author merely lists things out of context or addresses them one-sidedly. The work may contain errors or obscurities.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good and very good (3- 4): Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting comprehension and a skill to analyse and justify. The author has addressed the issue comprehensively. The work may contain some deficiencies.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5): Performance delineates an extensive whole and the author can apply knowledge in a multifaceted way or place it in various contexts. The work manifests independency and insight, and it is a flawless entity that involves justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.
Qualifications
Not required