Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Qualitative Analysis (5op)

Toteutuksen tunnus: TUTA0311-3005

Toteutuksen perustiedot


Ilmoittautumisaika
01.12.2023 - 08.01.2024
Ilmoittautuminen toteutukselle on päättynyt.
Ajoitus
15.01.2024 - 02.02.2024
Toteutus on päättynyt.
Opintopistemäärä
4 - 5
Lähiosuus
5 op
Toteutustapa
Lähiopetus
Yksikkö
Yhteiskuntatieteiden tiedekunta
Opetuskielet
englanti
Paikat
1 - 500
Opettajat
Hannah Strauss-Mazzullo
Vastuuopettaja
Hannah Strauss-Mazzullo
Ryhmät
YTKmetodit
YTK metodiopinnot
YTKENG
SOC/YTK - Courses offered in English
Opintojakso
TUTA0311

Arviointiasteikko

H-5

Tavoitteet

After completion of the course the student is able to analyze qualitative research material, and to recognize the ethical questions concerning the research material and qualitative analysis

Toteutustavat

The course contains lessons (18 h) and practical work with research material.

Suoritustavat

To successfully complete the course, the student needs to participate in lessons and seminars and to write a learning diary following instructions given; this way, the student obtains 4 ECTS. The student can obtain up to 5 ECTS for the course, if the exercise is extensive in scope and the student studies some additional literature.

Sisältö

In this course on qualitative analysis, emphasis is laid on text analysis of students’ own data: what kind of interpretations are possible.

Aika ja paikka

If students are experiencing many overlaps, we can rearrange parts of the course schedule. Remote access is available, but participation is required (we won't record sessions for later viewing).

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1)

Fail: Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work may be based on serious misunderstandings.

Sufficient and satisfactory (1-2): Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The author merely lists things out of context or addresses them one-sidedly. The work may contain errors or obscurities.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3)

Good and very good (3-4): Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting comprehension and a skill to analyse and justify. The author has addressed the issue comprehensively. The work may contain some deficiencies.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Excellent (5): Performance delineates an extensive whole and the author can apply knowledge in a multifaceted way or place it in various contexts. The work manifests independency and insight, and it is a flawless entity that involves justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.

Esitietovaatimukset

TUTA0111 Introduction to Scientific Thinking and Research

Siirry alkuun