Workshop in Graphic Design/ Illustration in Spatial Environment (5cr)
Code: AGRA0506BV24-3001
General information
- Enrollment
- 12.08.2025 - 04.11.2025
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 11.11.2025 - 21.11.2025
- The implementation has not yet started.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 3 - 5
- Local portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Faculty of Art and Design
- Campus
- Yliopisto, Yliopistonkatu 8, Rovaniemi
- Teaching languages
- English
- Finnish
- Seats
- 7 - 20
- Degree programmes
- Graphic Design
- Teachers
- Pinja Metsäkoivu
- Course
- AGRA0506BV24
Evaluation scale
H-5
Objective
After completing the course, the student
- has become familiar with designing images and patterns in a spatial environment through practice based work and produces the related samples and prototypes
Execution methods
HYBRID 1
Teaching is delivered in real time, face-to-face, and students are required to be physically present at the teaching sessions on campus. The implementation also includes teaching and learning that take place online. Teaching is delivered according to a pre-determined, published schedule. The description of the implementation must include all relevant details on the obligation to be present at each teaching session. If the implementation includes several face-to-face teaching sessions, they should, where possible, be scheduled for consecutive days, provided that this is appropriate to the objectives of the implementation. In addition, the implementation includes independent study and assignments to be completed independently.
Teachers should note: The HYBRID 1 profile combines face-to-face and online teaching, but face-to-face and online teaching are not delivered simultaneously.
Students should note: The HYBRID 1 profile always also requires physical presence at the face-to-face teaching sessions on campus.
Accomplishment methods
Planning and processing of design, presentation and feedback discussions total 36 - 60 h. Independent work 45-75 h.
Content
Illustration and pattern design project. Possibilities and meanings of the image in the spatial environment. Producing meanings and experiences through images. Prototyping, studio work and technical requirements in the process.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Fail
The performance is very incomplete or incorrect, or contains significant misunderstandings.
Passable and satisfactory (1-2)
Performance is narrow, superficial, or poorly matched to assignment. The performance is limited to listing things in isolation, or dealing with things unilaterally. Execution may contain errors or ambiguities.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good and commendable (3-4)
Performance corresponds to assignment, demonstrates understanding and the ability to analyze and justify. The whole picture has been formed, but there may be shortcomings.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5)
The performance outlines a broad entity and the knowledge can be applied multidimensionally or placed in different contexts. Performance demonstrates independent grip and insight. Performance is an intact entity that includes justified self-thinking or critical reflection. The answer is well written or implemented.