English: The teaching experience reflective report (TERR) (1cr)
Code: IEDU0014V24-3001
General information
- Enrollment
- 01.02.2024 - 02.02.2024
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 01.08.2024 - 31.05.2025
- Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 1 cr
- Local portion
- 1 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Faculty of Education
- Teaching languages
- English
- Degree programmes
- Class Teacher Education
Evaluation scale
H-5
Objective
Students should be able to reflect on their teaching, identify their strengths and areas which need development.
Execution methods
Self-reflective writing
Accomplishment methods
A successfully completed guided written report.
A guided written report 1 ects Pass/fail
However, if the home university of a student requires a grade, it can be granted on request.
A guided written report 1 ects 5-1/fail
If grading is needed, the supervising lecturer should be informed by a deadline.
Content
The Teaching Experience Reflective Report (TERR) is a guided written self-assessment of the Teaching Experience period (iedu 0013) and should demonstrate how students have met their personal and professional goals during teaching.
Teaching methods
Students who wish to take this module have to contact the tutor [E. Alssen elizabeth.alssen(at)ulapland.fi] in person prior to enrolment.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
Fail (0)
The self-evaluation aspects are mostly missing or are inadequate. The guidelines for self-evaluation are not followed. The student lists a few strengths and areas to improve but there are no links to theory. The student’s evaluation skills do not meet the minimum criteria for self-evaluation.
The report is not submitted.
Sufficient (1)
The student is able to reflect on own teaching and evaluate the teaching experience sufficiently. Both strengths and areas to improve are considered but sometimes superficially. Some aspects of self-evaluation may be inadequate or missing. The student demonstrates a sufficient level of self-evaluation skills. It is not quite clear if the student can use the learning experience in future teaching.
Satisfactory (2)
The student is able to reflect on own teaching and evaluate the teaching experience. Both strengths and areas to improve are considered in the report. However, the self-evaluation may miss some aspects. The student demonstrates a satisfactory level of self-evaluation skills. It is fairly clear that the student can use the learning experience in future teaching.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Good (3)
The student is able to reflect on own teaching and evaluate the teaching experience well. Both strengths and areas to improve are considered. The report includes accurate analysis of the teaching experience. The student demonstrates a good level of self-evaluation skills. It is evident that the student can use the learning experience in future teaching.
Very good (4)
The student is able to reflect on own teaching and evaluate the teaching experience thoroughly. Both strengths and areas to improve are considered. The report includes accurate analysis of the teaching experience with frequent links to theory. The student demonstrates a good level of self-evaluation skills. It is evident that the student can use the learning experience in future teaching.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent (5)
The student is able to reflect on own teaching and evaluate the teaching experience in an excellent way. Both strengths and areas to improve are considered. The report includes in-depth analysis of the teaching experience with links to theory. The analysis follows, or extends, guidelines. The student demonstrates a high level of self-evaluation skills. It is evident that the student can use the learning experience in future teaching.
Assessment criteria, approved/failed
Fail (0)
fail corresponds to "fail" (0) on the numerical scale. The self-evaluation aspects are mostly missing or are inadequate. The guidelines for self-evaluation are not followed. The student’s evaluation skills do not meet the minimum criteria for self-evaluation.
The report is not submitted.
pass / approved
“pass”corresponds to AT LEAST grade 3 on the numerical scale
The student is able to reflect on own teaching and evaluate the teaching experience well. Both strengths and areas to improve are considered. The report includes accurate analysis of the teaching experience. The student demonstrates a good level of self-evaluation skills. It is evident that the student can use the learning experience in future teaching.
Qualifications
iedu 0014 TERR should follow the Teaching Experience (iedu0013).CEFR level B2 of English. Avery general assessment of one’s CEFR level can be found at http://kaares.ulapland.fi/home/hkunta/ealssen/exss/CEFR.html