Interaction of well-being and clothing (5cr)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

At the end of the course student is able to:
- to view clothing as a part of overall well-being
- to analyze well-being, clothing and dress in different contexts
- to identify the future of clothing challenges and the aspects of well-being

Execution methods

60 hours lectures and guided exercises, 75 hours independent work

Accomplishment methods

Active participation to lectures and guided exercises and successful completion of studio work.

Content

The course examines the challenges and potentials for clothing drawing on culture and environment. The specific focus is on individual´s physical and mental well-being. The objective of the design is in the interaction of shape, materials and measurements/sizing of the clothing that promotes the user's well-being.

Materials

Gwilt, A. (2015). Fashion Design for Living. Routlegde. Koskennurmi-Sivonen, R. (Toim.) (2012) Johdatuksia pukeutumisen tutkimukseen. Tekstiilikulttuuriseuran julkaisuja 6. Helsinki: Tekstiilikulttuuriseura. Mair, C. (2018). The Psychology of Fashion. Routledge. Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional Design. Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books. O ́Mahony, M. (2011). Advanced Textiles for Health and Wellbeing. Thames & Hudson. Petermans, A. & Cain, R. (2019). Design for Wellbeing: An Applied Approach. Design for Social Responsibility. Routledge.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Fail
The performance is very incomplete or incorrect, or contains significant misunderstandings.

Passable and satisfactory (1-2)
Performance is narrow, superficial, or poorly matched to assignment. The performance is limited to listing things in isolation, or dealing with things unilaterally. Execution may contain errors or ambiguities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good and commendable (3-4)
Performance corresponds to assignment, demonstrates understanding and the ability to analyze and justify. The whole picture has been formed, but there may be shortcomings.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5)
The performance outlines a broad entity and the knowledge can be applied multidimensionally or placed in different contexts. Performance demonstrates independent grip and insight. Performance is an intact entity that includes justified self-thinking or critical reflection. The answer is well written or implemented.