Embodied and functional research in design (5cr)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

At the end of the course student is able to:
- Assess the special features, key concepts, principles and potentials of functional clothing.
- analyse and utilise physical and sensory experiences in product design process.
- solve the challenges of functional clothing as a research and form-based process.

Execution methods

60 hours lectures and guided exercises, 75 hours independent work

Accomplishment methods

Active participation to lectures and guided exercises and successful completion of studio work.

Content

The course introduces the trajectories of the body and the requirements of physicality in functional clothing. Design information is compiled into functional solutions for different environments. The design process and its results are documented according to the principles of user-oriented design. Designing the shape of functional clothing as part of the design process.

Materials

Risikko, T. & Marttila-Vesalainen, R. (2006). Vaatteet ja haasteet. Sanoma Pro Oy. Watkins, S. & Dunne. L. (2015). Functional Clothing Design: From Sportswear to Spacesuits. Fairchild.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Fail
The performance is very incomplete or incorrect, or contains significant misunderstandings.

Passable and satisfactory (1-2)
Performance is narrow, superficial, or poorly matched to assignment. The performance is limited to listing things in isolation, or dealing with things unilaterally. Execution may contain errors or ambiguities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good and commendable (3-4)
Performance corresponds to assignment, demonstrates understanding and the ability to analyze and justify. The whole picture has been formed, but there may be shortcomings.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5)
The performance outlines a broad entity and the knowledge can be applied multidimensionally or placed in different contexts. Performance demonstrates independent grip and insight. Performance is an intact entity that includes justified self-thinking or critical reflection. The answer is well written or implemented.