Finnish Design (4cr)
Code: UART1102-3010
General information
- Enrollment
- 01.12.2023 - 11.01.2024
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 01.01.2024 - 31.05.2024
- Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 4 cr
- Local portion
- 4 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Faculty of Art and Design
- Teaching languages
- English
- Teachers
- Milla Johansson
- Jenni-Liisa Yliniva
- Sara Korkala
- Tomi Knuutila
- Teacher in charge
- Milla Johansson
- Course
- UART1102
Evaluation scale
H-5
Objective
At the end of this course student
- has basic knowledge on Finnish design
- can recognize different fields of design culture in Finland
- can apply the understanding of Finnish design in assignments
Execution methods
Lectures about different fields of Finnish design by using examples. Group assignment, where students are asked to apply their knowledge on Finnish design. Lectures and guided exercises 28 hours, 80 hours independent work.
Accomplishment methods
Presence during the lectures (80%) and the finished assignment with a presentation.
Content
The design culture in Finland is presented and discussed by using Finnish industrial, graphic, audio-visual, fashion and textile designers and their works as examples. Lectures are given from different fields of design. The emphasis is to introduce the key elements of Finnish design. Students will make assignments in groups, where they will apply their knowledge on Finnish design.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)
(0) The performance is very incomplete or incorrect, or contains significant misunderstandings. (1-2) Performance is narrow, superficial, or poorly matched to assignment. The performance is limited to listing things in isolation, or dealing with things unilaterally. Execution may contain errors or ambiguities.
Assessment criteria, good (3)
Performance corresponds to assignment, demonstrates understanding and the ability to analyze and justify. The whole picture has been formed, but there may be shortcomings.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The performance outlines a broad entity and the knowledge can be applied multidimensionally or placed in different contexts. Performance demonstrates independent grip and insight. Performance is an intact entity that includes justified self-thinking or critical reflection. The tasks are well written and/or implemented.