Introduction to Scientific Thinking and Research (4cr)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

After completion of the course the student is able to
- think scientifically
- use the basic concepts: knowledge, theory, method, methodology, epistemology, concept, position, arguable
- formulate a research question
- dissect data as research material
- promote good scientific practices.

Execution methods

Lectures (10 h) and excercises (14 h). Independent work.

Accomplishment methods

Successful completion of a task given in a course.

Content

What is science? And what does it mean to think scientifically? The philosophy of science from Plato to Kuhn will be discussed regarding its relevance for contemporary research practices. Common procedures and frequent challenges in research will be identified and experienced through in-class exercises. Various methodological approaches, their application and evaluation will be examined.

Location and time

If students are experiencing many overlaps, we can rearrange parts of the course schedule. Remote access is available, but participation is requested (we don't record sessions for later viewing).

Materials

Topical literature will be announced in the beginning of the course.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Fail: Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work may be based on serious misunderstandings.

Sufficient and satisfactory (1-2): Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The author merely lists things out of context or addresses them one-sidedly. The work may contain errors or obscurities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good and very good (3-4): Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting comprehension and a skill to analyse and justify. The author has addressed the issue comprehensively. The work may contain some deficiencies.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5): Performance delineates an extensive whole and the author can apply knowledge in a multifaceted way or place it in various contexts. The work manifests independency and insight, and it is a flawless entity that involves justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.