The postcolonial politics of indigeneity (10cr)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

After completion of the course the student should be able to
- engage in critical analysis of conceptual, theoretical and debates concerning indigeneity and colonialism
- recognize ontological and epistemological premises of the theory of indigeneity and to reflect on its implications for theories and debates concerning the nature of the problem of colonialism globally
- demonstrate independent judgment and communication at a level commensurate with an advanced level of study.

Execution methods

Seminar (10-20 hours).

Accomplishment methods

Seminar participation and presentation (5 op); Written essay (5 op).

Content

Throughout the history of colonialism competing representations of the indigenous have been deployed by colonial powers to their own advantages and ends. Historically the indigenous have been represented as belonging to a past temporality in ways that legitimized colonial rule in the present and future. Today such representations of the indigenous as primitive and of the past are less prevalent or powerful. Scholars of International Relations are more likely to be read berating the failure of their disciplines to have challenged the teleological narratives underpinning the West’s historical sense of superiority. The concurrent assumption that indigenous peoples should open themselves to the world is also challenged increasingly by the converse idea that the West has much to learn from the indigenous. It is the West, today, it is argued widely, which must open itself to the Indigenous in ways that not only recognize the rights of the indigenous to life but the superior value of their ways of life. This course investigates this shift from a number of different perspectives. Does this shift represent progress in the struggle for indigenous emancipation from colonial rule? Or are indigenous peoples being manipulated and used in new ways by colonial powers? What does this shift tell us about changes in the characteristics of colonialism, power and political struggle?

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Sufficient and satisfactory (1–2)
Performance is lacking in scope, superficial, or corresponds poorly to the assignment. The author merely lists things out of context or addresses them one-sidedly. The work may contain errors or obscurities.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Good and very good (3–4)
Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting comprehension and a skill to analyse and justify. The author has addressed the issue comprehensively. The work may contain some deficiencies.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Excellent (5)
Performance delineates an extensive whole and the author can apply knowledge in a multifaceted way or place it in various contexts. The work manifests independency and insight, and it is a flawless entity that involves justified thinking or critical contemplation. The work is well written and implemented.

Assessment criteria, approved/failed

Pass
Performance corresponds to the assignment, manifesting comprehension and a skill to analyse and justify.

Fail
Performance is highly deficient or erroneous. The work may be based on serious misunderstandings.

Qualifications

BA studies.