Skip to main content

English (3cr)

Course unit code: C-10066-VÅV22EN01

General information


Credits
3 cr
Teaching language
Swedish
Institution
Novia University of Applied Sciences

Objective

The student: -shows the ability to communicate in a professional manner in a professional context in speaking as well as writing -master essential terminology within his/her field and is able to benefit from professional literature -has a positive attitude to developing his/her receptive and productive language skills -is aware of cultural differences in communication

Content

Working life related documents Professional communication in working life

Qualifications

No prior knowledge required

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam The student has a superficial knowledge of the subject (by heart reading) Assessment criteria for written work The student has followed the instructions and their knowledge of the other students' work is inadequate. The student shows limited substance knowledge, it can be essential. The student shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student has followed the instructions for the written work. They have a deficient knowledge of the substance also touching the essential.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam The student can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his / her views Assessment criteria for written work The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows insufficient knowledge about the other students' written work. The student master the substance of his work, but the application is limited

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Criteria for evaluation of the exam The student shows in his answer an in-depth knowledge and maturity beyond the traditional Criteria for evaluation of written work individually or in groups The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' written work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar. The written work and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, and independent working methods) The student has followed the instructions for the written work and shows that she has mastered the substance. They have read the other participants' work and can ask relevant questions and lead a discussion at the seminar.

Go back to top of page