Hematological Bioanalysis 2 (3cr)

Objective

The students - are familiar with the laboratory examination process in its entirety, but also the thorough phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical. - are familiar with laboratory examinations and are able to evaluate laboratory examination results related to blood cell disorders, acute leukemia and blood transfusion control. - actively looks for and are able to assimilate new knowledge. - are able to work as an expert in the field. - are prepared to improve quality and consider sustainable development within bioanalysis.

Content

Blood cells and blood cell disorders Bone marrow examination Laboratory examinations and methods at blood cells disorders related to erythrocytes, leukocytes, thrombocytes

Qualifications

Biosciences Bioanalysis

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1)

Exam answers depend heavily on words and expressions found in the literature has superficial knowledge of the subject, but shows a basic understanding of the subject Written assignment The student has partially followed the instructions for the written assignment. The student shows limited to a deficient knowledge of the knowledge of the substance.

Assessment criteria, good (3)

Exam can account for the literature, reflect and motivate his/her views can give an independent account of the literature understands most of the topic presents independent views and can apply ideas to analogous situations can motivate some of their claims and positions can give some own examples Written assignment The student has mostly followed the instructions for the written assignment and has mastered the substance of her/his work, but the application is limited. The student can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Exam has in-depth knowledge of the subject can analyze and interpret subject facts master the subject versatile has a broad grasp of the subject presents original and apposite examples Written assignment The student has followed the instructions for the assignment and shows that she/he has mastered the substance. She/he have read the other participants' assignments and can ask relevant questions and can lead a discussion at the seminar. The assignment and the possible opponentship show something out of the ordinary (technical execution, oral presentation, mature reflections, independent working methods)